News

Belgian Doctors & Medical Professionals Pen Open Letter Calling For Investigation Into WHO’s Role In Faking COVID-19 Scamdemic

The COVID-19 and coronavirus illness pandemic is fake. Yes, my friends, it is a faked pandemic started by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on a narrative from China that has caused irreparable damage to the world’s economy as well as the people affected by the ineffective draconian countermeasures to “flatten the curve”. The numbers do not add up to the level established to declare a pandemic. Why don’t the numbers add up? It is because for this one coronavirus, the way the statistics were compiled changed.

This declaration of a pandemic to promote an agenda is so egregious that a group of medical doctors and health professionals in Belgium has called for an investigation into the WHO. On September 24, 2020, GreatGameIndia.com reported the medical doctors and health professionals wrote an open letter to authorities demanding an investigation be done of the WHO for “faking a pandemic” through the coronavirus infodemic. The letter has gained world exposure among public health authorities because it could apply to any nation and/or State that “locked down their citizens rather than allow people freedom and permit medical professionals to bear the primary job of disease mitigation.”

Before getting into the meat of the letter, there is an issue that needs to be brought to the forefront. Medical professionals are primarily responsible for disease mitigation; however, these professionals voluntarily relinquished their responsibility to government and international agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institute of Health (NIH), and the WHO. Instead of questioning information early in this debacle, instead of challenging the findings of some scientists whose results did not meet Koch’s and Rivers’ postulates, instead of upholding their oath and ethics, the medical professionals followed along with the CDC, NIH, WHO, and the likes of Dr. Anthony Fauci to the point these individuals falsified data, skewed the varying fatality rates, and withheld treatment they all knew could help their patients. It has been the worst incident of scientific and medical malpractice in the world.

With that said, the letter is long and will not be presented in whole since it can be read at the reader’s leisure. What will be covered is the important points that many of us have been saying for months. The references the group used are listed at the end of the letter in the source cited.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?(2)

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Dirty Laundry updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In the first paragraph, the Belgian doctors and medical professionals assert, “After the initial panic surrounding covid-19, the objective facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore.” They are calling for an open debate between medical professionals, without censorship, and where all experts are present. Moreover, they are urging for politicians to “be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of corona-measures.” In their opinion, based upon preponderance and scientific review of the evidence, “The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good.” Therefore, the remedy is the end of all corona countermeasures and a return to life pre-corona.

We believe that the policy has introduced mandatory measures that are not sufficiently scientifically based, unilaterally directed, and that there is not enough space in the media for an open debate in which different views and opinions are heard. In addition, each municipality and province now has the authorization to add its own measures, whether well-founded or not.

This is exactly what we are seeing in the united States. South Dakota’s governor, Gretchen Whitmer, and New York governor Andrew Cuomo, in conjunction with Bill De Blasio (aka Warren Wilhelm, Jr.) are issuing increasingly draconian measures and tyranny against the people while other States, like South Dakota, has refrained from doing so, with Governor Kristi Noem basing the decision upon sound constitutional principles. And, in other States, each municipality and county are making decisions on countermeasures, following the information received from the public health department who gets their information from the CDC, NIH, WHO and Fauci.

Trending:

Sorry. No data so far.

The letter relays facts about COVID-19, or as we like to say CON-VID-19.

Gradually, the alarm bell was sounded from many sources: the objective facts showed a completely different reality. 

The course of covid-19 followed the course of a normal wave of infection similar to a flu season. As every year, we see a mix of flu viruses following the curve: first the rhinoviruses, then the influenza A and B viruses, followed by the coronaviruses. There is nothing different from what we normally see. [Emphasis mine.]

The use of the non-specific PCR test, which produces many false positives, showed an exponential picture.  This test was rushed through with an emergency procedure and was never seriously self-tested. The creator expressly warned that this test was intended for research and not for diagnostics.

The PCR test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is amplified each time. Any contamination (e.g. other viruses, debris from old virus genomes) can possibly result in false positives.

The test does not measure how many viruses are present in the sample. A real viral infection means a massive presence of viruses, the so-called virus load. If someone tests positive, this does not mean that that person is actually clinically infected, is ill or is going to become ill. Koch’s postulate was not fulfilled (“The pure agent found in a patient with complaints can provoke the same complaints in a healthy person”). [Emphasis mine.]

Since a positive PCR test does not automatically indicate active infection or infectivity, this does not justify the social measures taken, which are based solely on these tests. [Emphasis mine.]

This is what many of us have been saying for quite some time. And, it was exposed recently that the CDC did not have any samples of the isolate, aka virus, just two months after the CDC claimed the virus had been isolated. In short, the scientific community charged with isolating the CON-VID-19 virus violated every gold standard for doing so, which resulted in immeasurable destruction of billions of people’s lives. And for what?

These professionals did not stop there. The evidence of proof of malfeasance just got started. The brief discussion of the function of the immune system and its varying methods shows that information relayed to the public hid an area of immune function that play into herd immunity.

The penetration of these microorganisms is prevented by an advanced defense mechanism – the immune system. A strong immune system relies on normal daily exposure to these microbial influences. Overly hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our immunity. 12 13 Only people with a weak or faulty immune system should be protected by extensive hygiene or social distancing.

Our immune system consists of two parts: a congenital, non-specific immune system and an adaptive immune system.

The non-specific immune system forms a first barrier: skin, saliva, gastric juice, intestinal mucus, vibratory hair cells, commensal flora, … and prevents the attachment of micro-organisms to tissue.

If they do attach, macrophages can cause the microorganisms to be encapsulated and destroyed.

The adaptive immune system consists of mucosal immunity (IgA antibodies, mainly produced by cells in the intestines and lung epithelium), cellular immunity (T-cell activation), which can be generated in contact with foreign substances or microorganisms, and humoral immunity (IgM and IgG antibodies produced by the B cells).

Recent research shows that both systems are highly entangled.

It appears that most people already have a congenital or general immunity to e.g. influenza and other viruses. This is confirmed by the findings on the cruise ship Diamond Princess, which was quarantined because of a few passengers who died of Covid-19. Most of the passengers were elderly and were in an ideal situation of transmission on the ship. However, 75% did not appear to be infected. So even in this high-risk group, the majority are resistant to the virus.

A study in the journal Cell shows that most people neutralize the coronavirus by mucosal (IgA) and cellular immunity (T-cells), while experiencing few or no symptoms 14.

Researchers found up to 60% SARS-Cov-2 reactivity with CD4+T cells in a non-infected population, suggesting cross-reactivity with other cold (corona) viruses.15

Most people therefore already have a congenital or cross-immunity because they were already in contact with variants of the same virus.

The antibody formation (IgM and IgG) by B-cells only occupies a relatively small part of our immune system. This may explain why, with an antibody percentage of 5-10%, there may be a group immunity anyway. The efficacy of vaccines is assessed precisely on the basis of whether or not we have these antibodies. This is a misrepresentation.

Most people who test positive (PCR) have no complaints. Their immune system is strong enough. Strengthening natural immunity is a much more logical approach. Prevention is an important, insufficiently highlighted pillar: healthy, full-fledged nutrition, exercise in fresh air, without a mask, stress reduction and nourishing emotional and social contacts.

The public has been inundated with the narrative of “antibodies” against the CON-VID-19 for protection against the fake-demic with the only way to achieve antibody production is through a vaccine – a vaccine for some “virus” that has not been proved to exist, be different that what was seen in the past, and touted as “new” and more deadly than any other in the past. Instead of looking at this scam-demic with blinders on their eyes, these professionals are looking at the entire picture with a scientific approach, not a political one.

The letter discussed the consequences of the countermeasures on the physical and mental health of those subjected to such violation of liberty, the actual mortality rate of the CON-VID-19, and the safe and effective treatment of Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Azithromycin. These doctors pointed out the article in The Lancet that excoriated Hydroxychloroquine, declaring the drug to be ineffective resulting in many US State governments banning the drug and withholding valuable medical treatment from individuals who needed it. In fact, the article in The Lancet was based upon “faulty data” provided by Surgisphere who had a science fiction writer and a porn star on the payroll. The data was so bad the prestigious journal had to retract the article – a first in its history. Moreover, a French epidemiologist claims Gilead Pharmaceuticals threatened him if he did not “kill” his findings that Hydroxychloroquine cured COVID-19.

If you are not starting to ask questions about all of this and just dismissing the information, you are a big part of the problem in trying to regain the liberty and freedom Americans have lost.

It gets even better. The letter addresses mask wearing and social distancing.

Spreading occurs by drip infection (only for patients who cough or sneeze) and aerosols in closed, unventilated rooms. Contamination is therefore not possible in the open air. Contact tracing and epidemiological studies show that healthy people (or positively tested asymptomatic carriers) are virtually unable to transmit the virus. Healthy people therefore do not put each other at risk[Emphasis mine.]

Transfer via objects (e.g. money, shopping, or shopping trolleys) has not been scientifically proven. [Emphasis mine.]

All this seriously calls into question the whole policy of social distancing and compulsory mouth masks for healthy people – there is no scientific basis for this.

Oral masks belong in contexts where contacts with proven at-risk groups or people with upper respiratory complaints take place, and in a medical context/hospital-retirement home setting. They reduce the risk of droplet infection by sneezing or coughing. Oral masks in healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral infections. 

Wearing a mask is not without side effects.  Oxygen deficiency (headache, nausea, fatigue, loss of concentration) occurs fairly quickly, an effect similar to altitude sickness. Every day we now see patients complaining of headaches, sinus problems, respiratory problems, and hyperventilation due to wearing masks. In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism which affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of an increased transmission of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask[Emphasis mine.]

Our Labour Code (Codex 6) refers to a CO2 content (ventilation in workplaces) of 900 ppm, maximum 1200 ppm in special circumstances. After wearing a mask for one minute, this toxic limit is considerably exceeded to values that are three to four times higher than these maximum values. Anyone who wears a mask is therefore in an extreme poorly ventilated room. 

Inappropriate use of masks without a comprehensive medical cardio-pulmonary test file is therefore not recommended by recognized safety specialists for workers.

Hospitals have a sterile environment in their operating rooms where staff wear masks and there is precise regulation of humidity / temperature with appropriately monitored oxygen flow to compensate for this, thus meeting strict safety standards[Emphasis mine.]

How long have many of us who spent countless hours researching and finding information detailing the same thing these Belgian doctors are saying? It has been months now and many are continuing to believe Fauci, the CDC, the NIH, and the WHO while claiming to distrust government and the media. Information has been practically spoon-fed to the willfully ignorant who have spit it out like a baby eating baby food spinach for the first time.

And, FYI – there is no second wave, despite what the media, Fauci, the CDC, the NIH, and the WHO say. The curve flattened months back.

A second wave is now being discussed in Belgium, with a further tightening of the measures as a result. However, closer examination of Sciensano’s figures (latest report of 3 September 2020)37 shows that, although there has been an increase in the number of infections since mid-July, there was no increase in hospital admissions or deaths at that time. It is therefore not a second wave of corona, but a so-called “case chemistry” due to an increased number of tests.

The icing on this cake is the discussion of the “vaccine”.

Survey studies on influenza vaccinations show that in 10 years we have only succeeded three times in developing a vaccine with an efficiency rate of more than 50%. Vaccinating our elderly appears to be inefficient. Over 75 years of age, the efficacy is almost non-existent. [Emphasis mini.]

Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses, as we also see every year in the case of the influenza virus, a vaccine is at most a temporary solution, which requires new vaccines each time afterwards. An untested vaccine, which is implemented by emergency procedure and for which the manufacturers have already obtained legal immunity from possible harm, raises serious questions.  We do not wish to use our patients as guinea pigs. [Emphasis mine.]

On a global scale, 700 000 cases of damage or death are expected as a result of the vaccine.

If 95% of people experience Covid-19 virtually symptom-free, the risk of exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible. [Emphasis mine.]

Again, many of us have been saying this same thing, but just in a different manner. The letter continues discussing the role of social media in censoring accurate scientific information and the fear-mongering of the media, along with human rights, damages from these policies, and a list of remedies.

  • We therefore demand an immediate end to all measures.
  • We are questioning the legitimacy of the current advisory experts, who meet behind closed doors.
  • Following on from ACU 2020  https://acu2020.org/nederlandse-versie/ we call for an in-depth examination of the role of the WHO and the possible influence of conflicts of interest in this organization. It was also at the heart of the fight against the “infodemic”, i.e. the systematic censorship of all dissenting opinions in the media. This is unacceptable for a democratic state governed by the rule of law.

The most important aspect of this letter is the demand for an in-depth investigation into the WHO and its role in perpetrating damage upon nations and individuals due to the possible influence of its conflicts of interest, as well as its central participation in censoring opinions of those who dissented against the media. All nations should get behind these Belgian medical professionals to have the WHO investigated. If it is discovered the WHO, as an entire organization, is found to be at the heart of all of this, the agency should be disbanded at once and those individuals participating in the scam-demic should be charged and tried for their crimes. Moreover, the dismantling of the United Nations and all its octopus like agencies should occur as well.

Friends, it is long past time to wake up and fight daily for the freedoms and liberties that are being usurped from you daily through draconian and tyrannical unconstitutional illegal executive orders. Are you really going to take a vaccine laced with poison for some “illness” that has never been isolated or proven to exist, that has not been verified using the gold standard of medical research, that pharmaceutical companies have been granted immunity from liability, that was allowed to skip important steps in the process of testing and approval, and for which the survival rate is 99.987 %? There is no need for a vaccine for a coronavirus with a survival rate this high; and, there is a safe, effective and inexpensive medical treatment available. Who are governors and politicians to “order” withholding of that treatment based on the writings of a sci-fi fiction writer and a porn star? The Constitution does not give any governor or politician that authority.

It will not be said that people are not getting sick – they are. But, it isn’t from a fabricated “viral pandemic”. It is from something akin to the flu with a remarkably high survival rate. This is not the “killer” the WHO, CDC, NIH, and media wanted you to believe it was. The information has been presented to you. What you do with it is up to you. It is strongly suggested you open your eyes and discard your blinders if you are still wearing a mask and believing the media and government entities. If you do not wake up, your willful ignorance could mean your death.

Trending

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Suzanne Hamner (pen name) is a registered nurse, grandmother of 4, and a political independent residing in the state of Georgia, who is trying to mobilize the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government, invasion by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education.

Your Daily Briefing:

Fight Online Censorship!

Get the news Google and Facebook don't want you to see: Sign up for DC Dirty Laundry's daily briefing and do your own thinking!


Related Articles

Back to top button
Close
Close