Project Veritas Wins Court Case Over Undercover Videos

US District Court Judge Patti B. Saris ruled on Monday that the Massachusetts law (Section 99) banning secret recordings violates the First Amendment with regard to police and public officials. She ruled in favor of two plaintiffs- one who regularly live streams videos of police officers and Project Veritas who regularly records public officials. The state is expected to appeal.

project veritas

According to the court, because Boston police train recruits on both open and secret recordings and tells them the secret ones are illegal, it leaves a “conscious choice” to enforce Section 99 of the MA code.

take our poll - story continues below

Will you vote for President Trump in 2020 if he can’t get the wall built?

  • Will you vote for President Trump in 2020 if he can’t get the wall built?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Dirty Laundry updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: No Arrests? 10-Year-Old Drag Queen Photographed With Naked Man

MassLive reported,

Do these training materials evince a ‘conscious choice’ by BPD to enforce Section 99?” the court asked. “The answer is yes. Although an individual police officer retains discretion about whether to arrest someone for violating Section 99, the training materials cited above make clear that BPD ‘put flesh on the bones’ of Section 99 and ‘apparently instructed officers that they could make arrests’ for what the plaintiffs now claim was constitutionally protected conduct.”

Project Veritas cited four different projects it wanted to do in Massachusetts, but said it had refrained from doing due to Massachusetts’ law. Potential recordings would have included landlords renting unsafe apartments to college students, government officials to ascertain their positions on sanctuary cities, protest management activities by both government officials and private individuals related to Antifa protests and interactions with Harvard University officials to research its endowment and use of federal funds. 

The judge gave the parties one month to come up with language for placing an injunction against the Suffolk District Attorney and Boston Police. She stated that some privacy concerns are there for police and public officials, but it is “diminished” because of their positions.

***Visit our FREE SPEECH community built exclusively for our readers. Click to Join The Deplorables Network Today!***

James O’Keefe of Project Veritas was elated about the ruling, according to the Washington Times.

“The impact of this win will ripple throughout the nation. It will set historical precedent and keep citizen journalism alive in all fifty states.”

This ruling sets up the Massachusetts law to be struck down entirely at some point.

H/T Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children

Related:

Courtesy of Conservative Firing Line

A Note From The Publisher: On January 17th I received another 30 day suspension from Facebook for sharing this article. The truth is a violation of community standards. We will keep publishing the truth, but please understand that we just lost a lot of traffic and I need you to help spread the word if we are to keep growing.

I can't share anything on Facebook, but YOU can. Please do what you can to help. Click this link to share this article.

God Bless You, Dean Garrison

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.