Are you kidding me? After weeks of hearings, endless hours of testimony and consultations with hordes of lawyers, this is all that the Democrats can come up with? Originally, Democrats were accusing President Trump of bribery, extortion and various campaign finance violations, but the facts didn’t fit any of those crimes, and so they were abandoned. Instead, Democrats have drafted articles of impeachment focusing on “abuse of power” and “obstructing Congress”, and if this process was not so serious there would be howls of laughter all over the nation. I think that a bunch of five-year-old kids on a sugar high could have probably come up with something better than this. For the Democrats, this is a failure of epic proportions, and history will not remember them kindly.
The U.S. Constitution sets a very high standard for impeaching a president. In Article II, Section 4 it says the following: “The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
So in order for President Trump to be impeached and removed from office, he must be convicted of treason, bribery or some other crime.
But nowhere in federal law is “abuse of power” defined as a crime. And that is a huge problem, because how can you convict someone of “abuse of power” when there is no law against it?
Ultimately, “abuse of power” is a very vague phrase that could mean just about anything. After all, is there any president in modern American history that has not abused his power at some point?
And if President Trump does get impeached by the House, that is going to set an extremely dangerous precedent. In the future, are we going to start impeaching presidents for “abuse of power” whenever an opposition party gets control of the House of Representatives?
As for the charge of “obstructing Congress”, at least there is some precedent for that. It is actually properly called “contempt of Congress”, and the following is what Wikipedia has to say about it…
Contempt of Congress is the act of obstructing the work of the United States Congress or one of its committees. Historically, the bribery of a U.S. Senator or U.S. Representative was considered contempt of Congress. In modern times, contempt of Congress has generally applied to the refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee or subcommittee—usually seeking to compel either testimony or the production of requested documents.
Yes, President Trump has instructed members of his administration to refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas. But is this really something that we should be impeaching a sitting president for?
In the end, these are matters that can be easily sorted out by the courts. If the President or members of his administration continued to refuse to comply with Congress after a court had ordered them to do so, then the Democrats might have an argument, but that has not happened in this case.
And most Americans simply do not care that President Trump may have been “obstructing” Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler.
If any president is going to be impeached and removed from office, it needs to be for something very serious, and it needs to be a matter that generates a large national consensus.
The Democrats should have dropped this impeachment inquiry a long time ago, but at this point they can’t turn back without looking exceedingly foolish. Debate will begin on the articles of impeachment on Thursday, and according to the Washington Post, those articles of impeachment could “be voted on by the full House next week”.
Since the Democrats have a solid majority in the House, and since they are so obsessed with taking down Trump, the outcome of the vote is already a foregone conclusion.
They are going to vote to impeach President Trump, and that means that there will be a trial in the Senate.
If the Democrats had come up with something more substantial in their articles of impeachment, there would have been a chance that they could have swayed some moderate Republicans in the Senate, but as it stands now that does not appear to be too likely.
This entire impeachment process has been a comedy of errors by the Democrats. No matter how many breaks go their way, they just can’t seem to do anything right.
Of course they still believe that they are doing “the right thing”. During a hearing on Monday, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler made it sound so simple…
Walking through the evidence and testimony so far in the impeachment inquiry, Nadler observed, “the President welcomed foreign interference in our elections in 2016. He demanded it for 2020. Then he got caught.”
In doing so, Trump “violated his most basic responsibilities to the people” and broke his “oath” of office, Nadler concluded.
But in reality, the Democrats are not winning over the American people with their arguments.
In fact, they could actually be alienating the very voters that they desperately need to defeat Trump in November 2020. The following comes from an opinion piece by Liz Peek…
Here’s what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has done by undertaking a reckless and partisan drive to impeach the president: absolutely guaranteed that anyone who voted for Donald Trump in 2016 will vote for him again next year. Guaranteed, as a result, that Trump will be reelected.
Across the United States, tens of millions of Americans are furious that Donald Trump, a man they respect, has been bullied and bloodied by hate-filled, crazed political antagonists who mock him, lie shamelessly about his policies, obstruct his every move and, most disgusting of all, savagely demean his wife and children.
We’ll see what happens. But as things stand today, the Democrats do not seem to have a prayer of being successful in removing Trump from office.
However, they sure are stirring up a lot of anger and frustration on the left, and that could have very serious implications as we approach the next election.
If President Trump wins next November, the Democrats are going to be kicking themselves for ever going down this path. All of the polls taken before this impeachment process began looked really good for them, but it is entirely possible that they could blow yet another election that they could have easily won.
In politics, it never hurts to have a little luck. And even though this impeachment process has been very painful for President Trump, it may just be the stroke of luck that he needs to win another term.
- Kenneth Starr, Who Led Impeachment Against Clinton, Drops Bombshell About Trump Impeachment
- Democrat Jeff Van Drew Has Grave Warning For His Own Party On Impeachment “Be Careful What You Wish For”
- Rep Al Green declares there is ‘no limit’ to the number of times we will try to impeach Trump
- Watch: Matt Gaetz Destroys All 4 Professors Who Testified at Impeachment Inquiry With a Simple Question…
- Ratcliffe Drops The Schiff Impeachment Bombshell We’ve Been Waiting For
About the Author: I am a voice crying out for change in a society that generally seems content to stay asleep. My name is Michael Snyder and I am the publisher of The Economic Collapse Blog, End Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe. I have written four books that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The End, Get Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned) By purchasing those books you help to support my work. I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but due to government regulations I need those that republish my articles to include this “About the Author” section with each article. In order to comply with those government regulations, I need to tell you that the controversial opinions in this article are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. This article may contain opinions on political matters, but it is not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial or health decisions. Those responding to this article by making comments are solely responsible for their viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of Michael Snyder or the operators of the websites where my work is republished. I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook and Twitter, and any way that you can share these articles with others is a great help.
Your Daily Briefing:
Fight Online Censorship!
Get the news Google and Facebook don't want you to see: Sign up for DC Dirty Laundry's daily briefing and do your own thinking!