Supreme Court Shoots Down NYC’s 2nd Amendment–Avoidance Scheme

Editor’s Note: New York City is so liberal that the criminals may have to start hacking their victims with machetes. How in the world can a city with so much crime be so ready to hand over its guns? It’s not the people, it’s the leadership. Duh! This is what you get when you elect Dems every single election. -Dean

Last week the U.S. Supreme Court refused to buy into New York City’s transparent scheme to avoid the Court’s review, and wisely denied the city’s request to indefinitely put a hold on NY State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York. It’s the Supreme Court’s first true Second Amendment case since 2010.

For years, residents of New York have been required to apply for a “premises license” to own a handgun. Worse, city officials place a number of restrictions on what a resident can do with a firearm possessed pursuant to such a license. Most egregiously, license-holders may not transport their handguns outside of city limits, even to another home owned by the resident or to a licensed shooting range or competition.

Trending: SCOTUS Has Lost Their Damn Minds, Allows Sandy Hook Lawsuit Against Remington to Move Forward

Six years ago, NY State Rifle & Pistol filed this lawsuit. And for six years, New York has fervently defended its rule, maintaining it is necessary for “public safety.” That is, until the Supreme Court agreed to review the constitutionality of the regulation.

take our poll - story continues below

Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?

  • Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Dirty Laundry updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

New York officials came up with a new scheme and offered proposed changes to the regulation. These proposed changes are in direct response to the lawsuit, providing exceptions to handgun owners for transporting their guns to vacation homes, shooting ranges, or shooting competitions outside city limits. But these are only proposed changes with no guarantee that they would ever be implemented.

The Supreme Court saw through New York’s scheme. The Court denied the state’s request to delay briefing until New York resolved its rulemaking process. As a result, the briefing will go forward on the first true Second Amendment case since McDonald v. Chicago.

New York State Rifle & Pistol’s opening brief is expected on May 7th and amicus briefs in support are expected to be released on May 14th.

Sean Walton is a researcher and journalist for The Daily Sheeple. Send tips to [email protected]

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.